puddonhead
02-28 02:25 PM
It is irrelevant whether you are in L1b/H1/F1/"Visitor Visa" or even outside the US.
If you have worked for the sponsoring employer outside the USA for 1 year within the last 3 years in an executive capacity - you can apply in EB1.
If you are not sure if your job qualified for "executive capacity" - then it probably didn't. But maybe you should still speak with your lawyer and double check.
If you have worked for the sponsoring employer outside the USA for 1 year within the last 3 years in an executive capacity - you can apply in EB1.
If you are not sure if your job qualified for "executive capacity" - then it probably didn't. But maybe you should still speak with your lawyer and double check.
wallpaper Victoria Beckham Short
newbie2020
08-27 12:00 PM
I had posted this info much earlier..... Look at my other posts.
fasterthanlight�
05-08 09:01 PM
awwww!
Took the words straight out of my keyboard, only i was going to type more w's than that.
Took the words straight out of my keyboard, only i was going to type more w's than that.
2011 Better pic of Victoria Beckham
posmd
04-02 12:48 PM
The question is when.
Before or after the fall elections.
The current thinking is somehting will pass in the senate. Most likely with some sort of temporary worker status for the illegals.
If it offers a path to citizenship for the illegals then it will die in congress, if not then it stands a chance in conference.
If there is deadlock then this issue will be pushed to until after the elections.
That's my take on things.
Did you guys see Sen Frist on CNN wolf Blitzer show? Likewise that was the view of Sen Grassley.
Sad for us we are stuck in this politics.
Before or after the fall elections.
The current thinking is somehting will pass in the senate. Most likely with some sort of temporary worker status for the illegals.
If it offers a path to citizenship for the illegals then it will die in congress, if not then it stands a chance in conference.
If there is deadlock then this issue will be pushed to until after the elections.
That's my take on things.
Did you guys see Sen Frist on CNN wolf Blitzer show? Likewise that was the view of Sen Grassley.
Sad for us we are stuck in this politics.
more...
up_guy
04-09 11:52 AM
Adding one more question
Can employee pay 140 premium processing fees ?
This is my understanding PERM has no fees to department of labour. Is that right ?
Can employee may attorney fees for PERM ?
Can employee pay I-140 fees for USCIS ?
Can employee pay I-140 fees to attorney ?
I assume that employee can surely pay for USCIS-485 fees and attorney fees for this. ?
Can employee pay 140 premium processing fees ?
This is my understanding PERM has no fees to department of labour. Is that right ?
Can employee may attorney fees for PERM ?
Can employee pay I-140 fees for USCIS ?
Can employee pay I-140 fees to attorney ?
I assume that employee can surely pay for USCIS-485 fees and attorney fees for this. ?
krishna_brc
12-05 04:25 PM
:confused:Here is another scenario -
485 filed 1 year back and have been working with the GC sponsoring employer since then ( on H1, did not use EAD).
Employer is not going to revoke approved I-140 even if i change Job/H1.
Now, can i use Advance Parole to travel while working for the new employer on a new H1?
Your inputs are highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Krishna
485 filed 1 year back and have been working with the GC sponsoring employer since then ( on H1, did not use EAD).
Employer is not going to revoke approved I-140 even if i change Job/H1.
Now, can i use Advance Parole to travel while working for the new employer on a new H1?
Your inputs are highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Krishna
more...
jcrajput
10-03 08:49 AM
I am starting new thread for people who are re-filing their applications (I-485) because they were rejected for any reasons.
Please list following:
1. Rejection notice date (RND)
2. Reejction reason(s)
3. Whose fault
4. Status of re-filing
5. Date of package recevied at service center (date, time, received by, service center)
6. Status
7. Waiting for action from
I-485 Rejected/RND:09-21/I-140 Not Found/USCIS error/Re-file date:TBD/Recevied By: TBD/Status:PENDING/Waiting for: Lawyer to re-submit.
Please list following:
1. Rejection notice date (RND)
2. Reejction reason(s)
3. Whose fault
4. Status of re-filing
5. Date of package recevied at service center (date, time, received by, service center)
6. Status
7. Waiting for action from
I-485 Rejected/RND:09-21/I-140 Not Found/USCIS error/Re-file date:TBD/Recevied By: TBD/Status:PENDING/Waiting for: Lawyer to re-submit.
2010 Victoria Beckham frustrated by
mbartosik
04-08 04:40 PM
If we were able to get the 3 year visa rather than 1 year extensions, then the main problem that the BEC give us in a practical sense is that if we change jobs we loss our priority dates.
So while the slow processing is an administration issue, the law could allow for priority dates to be kept something like this:
"If a labor application has been pending for longer than [some time] then as of [some date], the applicant immigrant is able to keep the priority date of the original labor application whether or not the application is later withdrawn or disapproved."
This in combination with 3 year extensions would give people freedom to either refile for PERM with same employer or move jobs and file for PERM with a new employer.
----
Another solution would be to allow DoL to accept a large fee for premium processing. Making the fee large would have the effect of not too many using it and thus not overwhelming DoL, but it also might generate sufficient income to apply more resources to the remaining outstanding applications, and benefiting all while being practical.
----
Please comment.
So while the slow processing is an administration issue, the law could allow for priority dates to be kept something like this:
"If a labor application has been pending for longer than [some time] then as of [some date], the applicant immigrant is able to keep the priority date of the original labor application whether or not the application is later withdrawn or disapproved."
This in combination with 3 year extensions would give people freedom to either refile for PERM with same employer or move jobs and file for PERM with a new employer.
----
Another solution would be to allow DoL to accept a large fee for premium processing. Making the fee large would have the effect of not too many using it and thus not overwhelming DoL, but it also might generate sufficient income to apply more resources to the remaining outstanding applications, and benefiting all while being practical.
----
Please comment.
more...
marwan234
08-10 07:57 PM
they might post it late on friday as they have been working overtime. wait for it. it's weekly....isn't it? maybe tomorrow. they have been working saturdays. contractors love overtime.
hair Tags: Beckham, Victoria
dealguy007
05-12 06:29 PM
u can stay with A, no problem.
I am in the same boat, so can we use PD and I-140 from employer A even through my employment and H1B are not with Employer for a few months?
I am in the same boat, so can we use PD and I-140 from employer A even through my employment and H1B are not with Employer for a few months?
more...
rajsand
09-25 11:18 AM
WHICH CONGRESSMEN DID YOU CONTACT & WHO GAVE REPLIES.
THIS THREAD WOULD BE HELPFUL FOR OTHERS TO CONTACT CONGRESSMEN AND ENCOURAGE MORE TO DO SO.
If contacted local senators/congressmen , please mention which state they are from.
Just names will do.. no contact info required.
thanks
THIS THREAD WOULD BE HELPFUL FOR OTHERS TO CONTACT CONGRESSMEN AND ENCOURAGE MORE TO DO SO.
If contacted local senators/congressmen , please mention which state they are from.
Just names will do.. no contact info required.
thanks
hot VICTORIA BECKHAM: Abandoned
pbuckeye
08-24 07:36 AM
Convert H1 into Premium. You need to get the results before Sept-20. So that you can apply for F2 visa.
Preferably yes, you should apply before the I-94 expires.
However, I am not sure if a new H1B or F2 application MUST be filed before the I-94 expiry date. If the I-94 is expired, it won't be an "extension of H1B status" or "change of status to F-2" but it will be a new visa. So, she can still get an approval, then go out of the country to get the new visa stamped.
P.S. I am not a lawyer.
Preferably yes, you should apply before the I-94 expires.
However, I am not sure if a new H1B or F2 application MUST be filed before the I-94 expiry date. If the I-94 is expired, it won't be an "extension of H1B status" or "change of status to F-2" but it will be a new visa. So, she can still get an approval, then go out of the country to get the new visa stamped.
P.S. I am not a lawyer.
more...
house victoria beckham cut
Munshi75
06-05 06:23 PM
Open a thread for yourself!!!
Hi Guys,
In the instructions to file EAD they say to print name and alien receipt number on the back of the photos.
What number should we write? I-485 receipt number or receipt number for last EAD?
Can someone please respond?
Thanks
Hi Guys,
In the instructions to file EAD they say to print name and alien receipt number on the back of the photos.
What number should we write? I-485 receipt number or receipt number for last EAD?
Can someone please respond?
Thanks
tattoo Victoria Beckham
Jaime
04-21 04:06 AM
John McCain: Illegal Immigrants 'Intentionally Causing Accidents On The Freeway' (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/20/john-mccains-strange-clai_n_544559.html)
happens with age, and he probably missed his 6 PM bedtime
happens with age, and he probably missed his 6 PM bedtime
more...
pictures Vogue ♥ Victoria
willgetgc2005
04-28 11:37 AM
Hi,
Any experience with this law group for EB based GC ? Please do post. Thank You !
Any experience with this law group for EB based GC ? Please do post. Thank You !
dresses Victoria Beckham for Marie
virtual55
03-04 01:58 PM
How will you do that? I guess, while working on cases, user has to click somewhere to send an email. If they choose not to, then there will be no email. In my case, I never saw consistency in getting emails. I don't think that is a big issue, just check your status periodically. Bigger and important issue is how to get your case processed faster, and in sequence.
USCIS online case status system broken, My AP receipt numbers are not showing up online. we need to alert concerned USCIS authorities directly or thru IV's contacts in USCIS or thru AILA.
USCIS online case status system broken, My AP receipt numbers are not showing up online. we need to alert concerned USCIS authorities directly or thru IV's contacts in USCIS or thru AILA.
more...
makeup Victoria Beckham
p_kumar
07-20 01:27 PM
Sorry to post it here.I did not know how to create a thread.:o
Will this priority dates becoming current, affect the processing time of family based I-485?.my sis is a US citizen filing for my parents GC.It usually comes in 3 or 4 months but now ?????/
any replies are appreciated. :D
Will this priority dates becoming current, affect the processing time of family based I-485?.my sis is a US citizen filing for my parents GC.It usually comes in 3 or 4 months but now ?????/
any replies are appreciated. :D
girlfriend victoria beckham dresses 2011.
leoindiano
08-22 11:57 AM
receipt number, i had it for EAD renewal couple of days back. ...I remember both the times, they have used receipt numbers only....
hairstyles Facebook; Twitter; StumbleUpon
Blog Feeds
07-08 11:30 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
grp220glx
08-21 11:14 AM
Please see details in signature.
cooler
08-17 10:36 AM
My PD is Nov 24th 2005. EB2- India. Filed @NSC
Dates are current for my priority date. Havent heard anything USCIS on the primary or derivative case.
I opened a SR on 08/6th because the case should have been picked up based on their processing times. Haven't yet received any response on this.
I want to schedule an infopass appointment however looks like we need to wait for 30 days from the date of opening an SR, before scheduling this appointment.
Has anyone got slapped on the hand for not following this?
I have also sought help from my senator, however no useful information has come out of it.
Are their any other options available?
Dates are current for my priority date. Havent heard anything USCIS on the primary or derivative case.
I opened a SR on 08/6th because the case should have been picked up based on their processing times. Haven't yet received any response on this.
I want to schedule an infopass appointment however looks like we need to wait for 30 days from the date of opening an SR, before scheduling this appointment.
Has anyone got slapped on the hand for not following this?
I have also sought help from my senator, however no useful information has come out of it.
Are their any other options available?
No comments:
Post a Comment