rram555
01-26 03:27 AM
neither lawyer nor employer received Labor Hard Copy until today. I missed I-140 Premium
Processing because of Hard copy.
I signed one page of the original document (which the employer/lawyer should send to you)
before filing your I-140.
Thanks
Processing because of Hard copy.
I signed one page of the original document (which the employer/lawyer should send to you)
before filing your I-140.
Thanks
wallpaper Curly Short Hair Round Face.
Abacus101
05-12 07:48 AM
I understand that a H1B visa is the expense to the employer and is not a taxable benefit to the employee. If a company wishes to pay for the green card for the employee, granting them permanent residence in the U.S., is this a taxable benefit to the employee? Should it be added to their W-2? If yes, where is the IRS documentation on this? I can�t find it. Thanks.
vikrant29nov
03-08 04:56 AM
Thx for the compliment 3dy & vikas_088.
Vikas_088 - you are right, its my name(Vikrant). :crazy:
Vikas_088 - you are right, its my name(Vikrant). :crazy:
2011 Curly Hairstyles For Round
immigrant2007
03-21 11:52 AM
Please change the title to "300 Illegal Immigrants with Criminal Records Arrested in Texas". Don't set a false alarm.
technically by definition how an an illegal achieve the status of immigrant? I gues you meant illegal aliens? just kidding
technically by definition how an an illegal achieve the status of immigrant? I gues you meant illegal aliens? just kidding
more...
mohican
05-16 11:07 AM
As the title suggest, it is meant for folks who have invoked AC21 (1-140 approved, I-485 filed & pending more than 6 months, job desc almost similar) successfully and unsuccessfully.
If you have successfully transferred, can you comment on the experience, any denial notices that you had to overcome? Have you got the green card finally?
If unsuccessful, what issues are you facing? Is there some work around or going back to desh is the only option?
Thoughts/Comments--from AC21 league members.
Thanks
Mohican
If you have successfully transferred, can you comment on the experience, any denial notices that you had to overcome? Have you got the green card finally?
If unsuccessful, what issues are you facing? Is there some work around or going back to desh is the only option?
Thoughts/Comments--from AC21 league members.
Thanks
Mohican
kshitijnt
06-24 07:44 PM
I do not want to renew the advanced payroll, since I do not foresee travel within the next 18 months overseas. Is there a way I can skip the renewal this time around (1-year extension) and renew it the next time? If there is an emergency, I can still go to India and have the Visa-stamped since we have a valid H1/H4 right?
Are there any risks here?
As I read from your post, you are saying that you do not have H1 visa stamped in passport. These days consulates in India are pretty tough and they are issuing 221(g) etc for H1/H4 visa. And you could be denied visa for no fault of yours. It happened to my wife and it took 3 months for the consulate to get the clearance. So think about it. Personally for me AP is a very important document it allows you to travel in case of an emergency.
Are there any risks here?
As I read from your post, you are saying that you do not have H1 visa stamped in passport. These days consulates in India are pretty tough and they are issuing 221(g) etc for H1/H4 visa. And you could be denied visa for no fault of yours. It happened to my wife and it took 3 months for the consulate to get the clearance. So think about it. Personally for me AP is a very important document it allows you to travel in case of an emergency.
more...
abcd_1234
05-30 11:46 AM
Thanks for the reply meridiani.
So do you also mean to suggest that
1. 2 payslips are required to do the transfer?
2. I cannot do a H1 transfer before I start working for the consulatant?
So do you also mean to suggest that
1. 2 payslips are required to do the transfer?
2. I cannot do a H1 transfer before I start working for the consulatant?
2010 Short Hair Round Face
martinvisalaw
02-10 02:38 PM
It's hard to answer without seeing the actual NOIR. However, CIS could have made a mistake, which happens sometimes. Whatever the response, make sure that it is filed before the NOIR deadline. Good luck.
more...
mrana
01-18 12:59 PM
Hi,
Thanks for information.
So as you mentioned that you had similar case. Did you have LIN# only or 1-140 receipt ?
Thanks
Thanks for information.
So as you mentioned that you had similar case. Did you have LIN# only or 1-140 receipt ?
Thanks
hair Curly Hair Styles For Prom
raydon
03-24 11:00 PM
I've heard about AC21. What is AC360 - some new USCIS provision ?
more...
dhesha
04-15 04:24 PM
LC Sub/EB2 with PD June 2001 filed on July 27 with RD of Sept 8 got approved y'day. 140 filed on July 5th was approved on jan. no RFE, all were smooth.
I was afraid because of my last years on L1B and filed H1b though this year quota and not sure if i'm lucky to have a number lottery. This gave me major relaxation.
Best of luck you all.
Had 1 Soft LUD on Jan 31 on 485 application.
USCIS is doing a great job thank to IV to make these possible.
NJoy the USCIS broken system of LC SUB buddy.
We (Non-LC-SUB) are not so lucky and are stuck for more than 8 years in it and still no hope.
Nothing against you -- its just that you need to be lucky to take the right decision otherwise you will be punished like many of us.
I was afraid because of my last years on L1B and filed H1b though this year quota and not sure if i'm lucky to have a number lottery. This gave me major relaxation.
Best of luck you all.
Had 1 Soft LUD on Jan 31 on 485 application.
USCIS is doing a great job thank to IV to make these possible.
NJoy the USCIS broken system of LC SUB buddy.
We (Non-LC-SUB) are not so lucky and are stuck for more than 8 years in it and still no hope.
Nothing against you -- its just that you need to be lucky to take the right decision otherwise you will be punished like many of us.
hot Your face shape is round so,
peekay
02-17 09:35 AM
Hello All,
I am going to India and have to go for stamping. I come under Chennai consular district but planning to go to Delhi because of high rejection rate in Chennai.
First thing, I am not sure if I can go to Delhi when I come under Chennai consular district.
Second thing is, should there be a valid reason with supporting documents for attending the visa appointment in Delhi instead of Chennai.
Your thoughts and experiences on the above points would be very helpul for me in resolving this issue. Thanks a lot.
I am going to India and have to go for stamping. I come under Chennai consular district but planning to go to Delhi because of high rejection rate in Chennai.
First thing, I am not sure if I can go to Delhi when I come under Chennai consular district.
Second thing is, should there be a valid reason with supporting documents for attending the visa appointment in Delhi instead of Chennai.
Your thoughts and experiences on the above points would be very helpul for me in resolving this issue. Thanks a lot.
more...
house makeup Wavy Short Hair Styles
vallabhu
08-26 02:11 PM
Bump
tattoo 2011 best short haircut
mnq1979
12-20 08:13 AM
thank you so much for the reassurance, have been getting mixed reports of immigration officers denying re-entry, so am a little perturbed :) dont want to be stuck in a situation where i cannot re-enter :)
dont worry.....you shd be fine...think +ve and remain +ve...!!!!!!!!!!
dont worry.....you shd be fine...think +ve and remain +ve...!!!!!!!!!!
more...
pictures images Short Hair Round Face
yabadaba
03-25 02:45 PM
hey guys they are also asking for itenary details. so does that mean i need to book my ticket before that? can i not get my visa and then book my tix?
dresses Haircuts for Round Face Shapes
starscream
06-06 10:29 AM
Below is a decsription of this amendment from AILA document which lists all the amendments that were discussed yesterday
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22584
It confirms that the amendment #1231 applies to Y visa only. On the Senate discussion thread yesterday when this amedment was being discussed some body mentioned something along the lines that that Sen. Kennedy said he supported employer recruitment for all jobs and that really scared me ... I think Sen. Kennedy might have been referring to jobs that require the Y visa
This amendment does not mention anything on H1Bs. There was a lot of discussion on this point yesterday. I think we can breathe a litlle easy now.
The CIR does have other restrictions on H1B like $5000 more fees, restrictions for consulting companies & non-disaplacement clause but I don't think any GC type LABOR CERTIFICATION is required.
From the aila doc:
Durbin Amendment (#1231) to Remove DOL-Determined Labor Shortages as an Exception to Y Visa Recruitment Requirements
Senator Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment that eliminates DOL-determined labor shortages as an exception to employer recruitment requirements for Y visas. Senator Durbin argued that the amendment is an attempt to require that jobs be offered to Americans before they are offered to Y visa holders in the new worker program. Removing the provision in the underlying bill allowing the Secretary of Labor to declare labor shortages, he said, would achieve this, since all employers who use the Y visa program would always be required to offer jobs to Americans first. Senator Durbin cited the AFL-CIO as a strong supporter of his measure. Senator Grassley (R-IA), a co-sponsor of the amendment, also expressed his support for the amendment.
Senator Specter argued in response that this amendment is simply unnecessary, since American workers and their wages are already protected under the law. Senator Kennedy, however, expressed support for the amendment. He agreed with the general principle that a measure protecting American workers is good for the country. Ensuring that new Y visa workers don’t encroach upon American jobs or affect American wages, he said, is a step in that direction.
The amendment was agreed to by a vote of 71-22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22584
It confirms that the amendment #1231 applies to Y visa only. On the Senate discussion thread yesterday when this amedment was being discussed some body mentioned something along the lines that that Sen. Kennedy said he supported employer recruitment for all jobs and that really scared me ... I think Sen. Kennedy might have been referring to jobs that require the Y visa
This amendment does not mention anything on H1Bs. There was a lot of discussion on this point yesterday. I think we can breathe a litlle easy now.
The CIR does have other restrictions on H1B like $5000 more fees, restrictions for consulting companies & non-disaplacement clause but I don't think any GC type LABOR CERTIFICATION is required.
From the aila doc:
Durbin Amendment (#1231) to Remove DOL-Determined Labor Shortages as an Exception to Y Visa Recruitment Requirements
Senator Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment that eliminates DOL-determined labor shortages as an exception to employer recruitment requirements for Y visas. Senator Durbin argued that the amendment is an attempt to require that jobs be offered to Americans before they are offered to Y visa holders in the new worker program. Removing the provision in the underlying bill allowing the Secretary of Labor to declare labor shortages, he said, would achieve this, since all employers who use the Y visa program would always be required to offer jobs to Americans first. Senator Durbin cited the AFL-CIO as a strong supporter of his measure. Senator Grassley (R-IA), a co-sponsor of the amendment, also expressed his support for the amendment.
Senator Specter argued in response that this amendment is simply unnecessary, since American workers and their wages are already protected under the law. Senator Kennedy, however, expressed support for the amendment. He agreed with the general principle that a measure protecting American workers is good for the country. Ensuring that new Y visa workers don’t encroach upon American jobs or affect American wages, he said, is a step in that direction.
The amendment was agreed to by a vote of 71-22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
more...
makeup curly short hair round
dilbert_cal
06-24 09:24 PM
If your job location has changed from State 'S1' to State 'S2', your labor petition filed from Company 'A' is invalid. You cannot modify your 140 in the sense of changing job location from one state to another. Since your 140 is pending for a good period of time, here is what you can do :-
i) Get it converted to premium as suggested above and you'll know whether it is approved or not in 15 days.
If it is approved, you can file 485 based on it but you may have issues in the future ( possible but unknown if it will be caught at 485 stage )
If it is denied, you are in a soup as without an approved 140, you cannot port your PD.
Whatever you do, dont move onto EAD and work on EAD until your 140 is approved.
i) Get it converted to premium as suggested above and you'll know whether it is approved or not in 15 days.
If it is approved, you can file 485 based on it but you may have issues in the future ( possible but unknown if it will be caught at 485 stage )
If it is denied, you are in a soup as without an approved 140, you cannot port your PD.
Whatever you do, dont move onto EAD and work on EAD until your 140 is approved.
girlfriend house Short Hair Round Face
gc_chahiye
06-28 03:17 AM
even if he goes back to A, these intervening 3 months might be dicey. His status cant be on B's H1 since that was denied, and it cant be on A's H1 since A is not paying him in these three months.
hairstyles Short round face curly hair
OlgaJ
April 3rd, 2005, 06:50 AM
I like the sharp sparkle of the first one.
Olga
Olga
gcdreamer05
11-24 04:19 PM
We filed our 485 on July 2nd 2007 at Nebraska office � EB3 � July 7, 2001
- The case was shifted to Texas and we received notices from Texas office with receipt date of August 27.
- Our date is now current however processing at Texas is still stuck at June 27, 2007.
- Does this mean our RD is now 08/27/07 even though it was recd. at Nebraska on 07/02/07??
Unfortunately yes - RD Aug 27, you can confirm this by looking at your receipt notice that you got from your attorney.
- The case was shifted to Texas and we received notices from Texas office with receipt date of August 27.
- Our date is now current however processing at Texas is still stuck at June 27, 2007.
- Does this mean our RD is now 08/27/07 even though it was recd. at Nebraska on 07/02/07??
Unfortunately yes - RD Aug 27, you can confirm this by looking at your receipt notice that you got from your attorney.
dealguy007
05-19 08:59 AM
Hi
first labor approved in may 2006 under EB3
140 was approved in 2007
Since I already had masters before I joined the company
EB2 labor applied and received approval in Jan 2011
My attorney applied for 140 porting but received priority date as Jan 2011 instead of may 2006. My attorney says immigrations has made a mistake, attorney contacted them and received a reference number basically asking attorney to call back on Jun 1st. I'm concerned on what went wrong and what could be the worst case scenario. How much time are talking about here.
Any information will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
It will alright, wait for few more weeks till attorney fixes the issue.
first labor approved in may 2006 under EB3
140 was approved in 2007
Since I already had masters before I joined the company
EB2 labor applied and received approval in Jan 2011
My attorney applied for 140 porting but received priority date as Jan 2011 instead of may 2006. My attorney says immigrations has made a mistake, attorney contacted them and received a reference number basically asking attorney to call back on Jun 1st. I'm concerned on what went wrong and what could be the worst case scenario. How much time are talking about here.
Any information will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
It will alright, wait for few more weeks till attorney fixes the issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment