upuaut8
08-15 03:38 AM
It's easy, I've been doing it all week long.
Choose to export. When you do it comes up with a menu which lets you choose wireframe export. Also it allows you to choose which type of fills you want to use, as well as options for either the complete wireframe, or just the edges.
I'll be posting my first example of interesting uses for this effect, tomarrow some time.
Choose to export. When you do it comes up with a menu which lets you choose wireframe export. Also it allows you to choose which type of fills you want to use, as well as options for either the complete wireframe, or just the edges.
I'll be posting my first example of interesting uses for this effect, tomarrow some time.
wallpaper houston astros uniforms 2011.
viveksri
06-19 12:46 PM
p7810456, makemygc ,
I really don�t know which letter/word in the title of thread makes you think about �VISA BULLETIN�. Moreover USCIS is not the one that issue Monthly Visa Bulletin.
Anyway I have changed the title.
Thanks,
I really don�t know which letter/word in the title of thread makes you think about �VISA BULLETIN�. Moreover USCIS is not the one that issue Monthly Visa Bulletin.
Anyway I have changed the title.
Thanks,
needhelp!
10-12 12:06 PM
don't forget to dial in after your meet & greet.
2011 (c) Houston Astros
India76
03-02 09:52 AM
Wow, This is good to know that at POE they can allow to stay more than the visa expiry date. Thanks.
more...
indianindian2006
04-12 04:13 PM
Gurus,
Today i received a mail(04/12/2009) .Uscis issued an RFE. I am still waiting for it in mail.
she is currently in india . coming back on 04/15/2009. will there be any problem for her while coming back. I am july 2007 filer on priority Date eb3 ( 04/23/2003). I have left my employer last year.My 140 was approved on feb 2007. what are my options.
Thanks,
Manish
Is your wife travelling on H4 or AP.In both cases she should be fine.If she will travel on H4 then this is totally unrelated as your H1 is still valid and and she will be fine,if she is on AP then after RFE your case is suspended for about 3 weeks when you reply for the RFE and according to me she will be safe in the interim period of suspension to travel.
Please consult your attorney for confirmation.
Hope this helps.
Today i received a mail(04/12/2009) .Uscis issued an RFE. I am still waiting for it in mail.
she is currently in india . coming back on 04/15/2009. will there be any problem for her while coming back. I am july 2007 filer on priority Date eb3 ( 04/23/2003). I have left my employer last year.My 140 was approved on feb 2007. what are my options.
Thanks,
Manish
Is your wife travelling on H4 or AP.In both cases she should be fine.If she will travel on H4 then this is totally unrelated as your H1 is still valid and and she will be fine,if she is on AP then after RFE your case is suspended for about 3 weeks when you reply for the RFE and according to me she will be safe in the interim period of suspension to travel.
Please consult your attorney for confirmation.
Hope this helps.
bidme_786
01-02 12:46 PM
I got a soft luds on my previous H1B which was approbed in 2007 Feb and a Case Status Information email for I-140 which was approved in Dec - 2006.
more...
cyclone_p
07-20 09:51 AM
No updates. Waiting for FP notice.
2010 Lance Berkman was the Astros
Jaime
09-12 02:59 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=114880&postcount=3560
Thanks
Thanks
more...
DSP
01-13 01:38 AM
I had my parents and my grandmom visit me last year. All three of them went together for the visa interview at Delhi. The only question the officer asked my father was - Why do you want to take your Mom to visit the US 'now'? and my dad replied, 'If I do not take her now, when will I take her?'. They all got a 10 year visa.
Hope that helps,
All the best!
Hope that helps,
All the best!
hair old old houston astros
ysnraju
12-17 07:30 PM
My PD also wrong. for almost last 2 months I am trying DOL through My attorney That includes so far 8 fax letters requesting the same but no results sofar
more...
bobzibub
07-27 10:45 AM
Thought folks might find the following interesting.
I recently returned from a visit to Canada where I stayed with my brother-in-law, who owns a small but very successful web development shop. He told me that due to the booming Canadian economy, he can no longer find experienced programmers at reasonable bill rates. So he's been doing some outsourcing to get cheap foreign labor ... hiring American programmers !
Where was that? Vancouver? Toronto?
Was it Java or LAMP or .NET stuff?
I recently returned from a visit to Canada where I stayed with my brother-in-law, who owns a small but very successful web development shop. He told me that due to the booming Canadian economy, he can no longer find experienced programmers at reasonable bill rates. So he's been doing some outsourcing to get cheap foreign labor ... hiring American programmers !
Where was that? Vancouver? Toronto?
Was it Java or LAMP or .NET stuff?
hot makeup 1980s houston astros
minimalist
05-23 09:21 PM
My wife was on H4. Her VISA and I94 are expired. I'm still on H1 (valid). Our 485 applications are pending. We have valid EAD cards but not using them. Can I apply for my wife's SSN using the EAD Card + I485 Receipt? Or does she need to have valid I-94 along with the EAD to apply for SSN? Does she need SSN to work on EAD?
You should be able to apply for SSN with EAD. Please read the SSN filing instructions and come back if you have any specific questions.
You should be able to apply for SSN with EAD. Please read the SSN filing instructions and come back if you have any specific questions.
more...
house Houston Astros Coaches
GCKaIntezar
01-15 03:08 PM
Thanks for setting this up Anurakt. I'll be calling-in.
tattoo 2010 of the Houston Astros
Blog Feeds
01-27 06:40 AM
Some good news for visa (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html)holders that are about to loose their visa sponsored jobs or already lost the visa job. In a decision issued today by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) in Matter of Neto, which empowers immigration judges who are considering deportation of individuals with approved work-related visa petitions and pending permanent residence applications. The issue at stake is whether an immigration judge has the authority to decide whether the approved visa petition - issued for one job - remains valid when the individual changes jobs. Without a valid visa petition, the individual will not be eligible for permanent residence.
In 2000, Congress passed the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act, which allowed applicants for permanent residence based on approved visa petitions the flexibility to change jobs. However, in 2005, the BIA decided in Matter of Perez-Vargas that an immigration judge had no authority to decide whether a new job was the same as or similar to the old job, which determines validity of their visa petition. This left these applicants for permanent residence in limbo, stripping them of the ability to benefit from the 2000 law while in removal proceedings because the judges couldn't, and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service wouldn't, determine the validity of their visa petition.
Today, in Matter of Neto, the BIA overruled its own earlier decision that denied judges this authority and will now allow them to decide whether a new job is acceptable, thus keeping the individual's eligibility for permanent residence intact. In which case, the visa petition remains valid and the immigrant worker can proceed with an application to become a lawful permanent resident - potentially saving them from deportation.
Read the amicus brief filed by the Legal Action Center Download file (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/NETO-AmiciCuriaeBrief.pdf)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/01/ac21_h1b_visas_immigration_jud.html)
In 2000, Congress passed the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act, which allowed applicants for permanent residence based on approved visa petitions the flexibility to change jobs. However, in 2005, the BIA decided in Matter of Perez-Vargas that an immigration judge had no authority to decide whether a new job was the same as or similar to the old job, which determines validity of their visa petition. This left these applicants for permanent residence in limbo, stripping them of the ability to benefit from the 2000 law while in removal proceedings because the judges couldn't, and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service wouldn't, determine the validity of their visa petition.
Today, in Matter of Neto, the BIA overruled its own earlier decision that denied judges this authority and will now allow them to decide whether a new job is acceptable, thus keeping the individual's eligibility for permanent residence intact. In which case, the visa petition remains valid and the immigrant worker can proceed with an application to become a lawful permanent resident - potentially saving them from deportation.
Read the amicus brief filed by the Legal Action Center Download file (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/NETO-AmiciCuriaeBrief.pdf)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/01/ac21_h1b_visas_immigration_jud.html)
more...
pictures 2005 old houston astros logo.
looneytunezez
11-02 12:19 PM
Thanks...but i agree with your paralegal friend.......there is no logic to it all.
logic and law are not usually on "friendly" terms....
i guess the argument is that one who hasn't filed, cannot be counted.... and you cannot file until you are current.... so no backlog exists .... so non-filers (due to PD) do not exist and hence there is no "official" classification for them i guess.
I know what looneytunezez says is logical, however, a friend of mine who is a paralegal in a big immigration law firm says otherwise (something similar to what blacktongue says) - don't know what to make of it, hence the post..
logic and law are not usually on "friendly" terms....
i guess the argument is that one who hasn't filed, cannot be counted.... and you cannot file until you are current.... so no backlog exists .... so non-filers (due to PD) do not exist and hence there is no "official" classification for them i guess.
I know what looneytunezez says is logical, however, a friend of mine who is a paralegal in a big immigration law firm says otherwise (something similar to what blacktongue says) - don't know what to make of it, hence the post..
dresses for the Houston Astros.
ramaonline
12-09 10:38 PM
u can file for a 3 year ext of H1 status under AC21 - This will enable u to continue in valid status while the retrogression eases if it ever will.
Also note that portability is allowed and u can switch employers during this period. u can retain ur current PD and use it for a later GC app if reqd
Also note that portability is allowed and u can switch employers during this period. u can retain ur current PD and use it for a later GC app if reqd
more...
makeup Houston Astros 1999 uniform
eastindia
12-30 02:23 PM
It does not look good. Has been oral arguments for some time now.
Any updates? Did they move forward from the oral
Any updates? Did they move forward from the oral
girlfriend While the Houston Astros
ras
06-30 06:28 PM
Here is a memo from one of the law firms, I found on the net.
http://www.michaelpiston.net/documents/m/changing%20employer%20after%20I-485%20is%20approved.pdf
After digging thro' forums it seems everyone talks about having the "intention" of staying with the Employer after GC.
Here's my question.
- Should the "intention" be on the day of filing 485 or the day you get GC ? (a date in future that no one can predict).
If the "intention" has to be at the time of 485 filing then, after 180 days of filing 485 one should be able to change employers, irrespective of the case being approved or NOT.
thoughts/comments ??
Logically speaking it should be while filing the petition not while getting the GC approved. All in all you should portray an intention of joining in your activities through your GC process. However, if your position warrants a shift and you can justify it, I guess you are good to go.
http://www.michaelpiston.net/documents/m/changing%20employer%20after%20I-485%20is%20approved.pdf
After digging thro' forums it seems everyone talks about having the "intention" of staying with the Employer after GC.
Here's my question.
- Should the "intention" be on the day of filing 485 or the day you get GC ? (a date in future that no one can predict).
If the "intention" has to be at the time of 485 filing then, after 180 days of filing 485 one should be able to change employers, irrespective of the case being approved or NOT.
thoughts/comments ??
Logically speaking it should be while filing the petition not while getting the GC approved. All in all you should portray an intention of joining in your activities through your GC process. However, if your position warrants a shift and you can justify it, I guess you are good to go.
hairstyles Houston Astros
jnraajan
04-11 02:22 PM
^^^^^^^^^
santa123
08-06 08:00 PM
Friends,
There used to be a number of threads created / discussed every day on IV... those good ol' days... a lot of good discussions on a variety of topics, including immigration:D
But of late I am seeing fewer threads on IV and wondering what could be the reason.
1. Either a lot of folks got greened and stopped visiting IV
2. or a lot of folks lost jobs & abandoned their GC process
3. or a lot of folks got frustrated and left for their home countries
Is this just me feeling this way or...?
There used to be a number of threads created / discussed every day on IV... those good ol' days... a lot of good discussions on a variety of topics, including immigration:D
But of late I am seeing fewer threads on IV and wondering what could be the reason.
1. Either a lot of folks got greened and stopped visiting IV
2. or a lot of folks lost jobs & abandoned their GC process
3. or a lot of folks got frustrated and left for their home countries
Is this just me feeling this way or...?
LostInGCProcess
07-20 11:20 AM
Hi there,
I changed my address using the online facility provided by USCIS by filling out the AR-11 form. I got the confirmation for that. After that when I started to change for pending petitions (I-485), lost my internet connection. I could not go back to that part again.
I checked all the FAQ's etc but could not find a link that would explain how to change only the pending petitions, since AR-11 was already changed.
Please let me know if anybody was in the similar situation.
Thank you!!!
I changed my address using the online facility provided by USCIS by filling out the AR-11 form. I got the confirmation for that. After that when I started to change for pending petitions (I-485), lost my internet connection. I could not go back to that part again.
I checked all the FAQ's etc but could not find a link that would explain how to change only the pending petitions, since AR-11 was already changed.
Please let me know if anybody was in the similar situation.
Thank you!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment