andycool
06-24 04:22 PM
My spouse submitted her EAD e-filing application 2 months back. How long does it take to receive the finger printing appointment notice. Kindly advise.
My wife applied for EAD on April 1st - Never received FP , on may 12 received rfe for Photos..
I e filed my EAD on April 26 - got FP notice on april 30
Hope this helps
Thanks
My wife applied for EAD on April 1st - Never received FP , on may 12 received rfe for Photos..
I e filed my EAD on April 26 - got FP notice on april 30
Hope this helps
Thanks
wallpaper Bethenny Frankel, pregnant
gchodhry
02-28 01:28 PM
Hi,
I am on L-1 Visa. My company is ready to apply green card and H1 visa as well. If my green card application is filed, then change in my visa status L1 to H1 is going to impact to my green card application?
In case I apply H1 from other employer, in that case what would be the impact on my green card application?
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Gagan Chodhry
I am on L-1 Visa. My company is ready to apply green card and H1 visa as well. If my green card application is filed, then change in my visa status L1 to H1 is going to impact to my green card application?
In case I apply H1 from other employer, in that case what would be the impact on my green card application?
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Gagan Chodhry
ameryki
05-28 03:32 PM
will the lawyer get the renewed ead cards or since you applied for renewal you will receive the cards?
2011 New Mom Bethenny Frankel: I#39;m
doshhar
10-09 10:31 PM
I am looking for the similar information regarding temp. EAD for my wife. Can someone please advise here..?
more...
snathan
09-15 04:07 PM
I am an Indian citizen. I have an approved I-140 under National Interest Waiver with a PD of Aug 31, 2007. I am now a permanently employed scientist at a National Lab. I think I am now eligible for application under EB-1 Outstanding researcher category. Is it possible to apply for I-485 without another I-140? It will take quite some time to secure all the recommendation letters to apply for EB-1 (OR). I am wondering if I can bypass the whole process of I-140 and directly apply for adjustment of status based on my approved I-140 saving time and effort.
Thanks in advance for any answer.
You need to start from ground zero...EB2 NIW is different from EB1, so you can not use the EB2-140
Thanks in advance for any answer.
You need to start from ground zero...EB2 NIW is different from EB1, so you can not use the EB2-140
snathan
02-28 11:34 PM
I am on F1 visa. I enrolled in one of the university. I don't attend university in person. I do attend classes online from another state. My question is that I am resident of which state ?? Will I be automatically resident of state where exactly my university is ? I know it is mandatory to attend classes in person on F1. Can you please advise ? How is residency considered ?
Thank you very much.
Its illegal and you can not attend only online course with F1 visa.
Thank you very much.
Its illegal and you can not attend only online course with F1 visa.
more...
whattodo21
04-19 10:50 AM
this is good information, thank you.
Lately, US Consular Officers in Canada have been reluctant to issue H-1B visas when the applicant does not have a US or Canadian University Degree AND has never had an H-1B visa issued at his/her home Consulate. The following is an excerpt from Visa Requirements � U.S. Consular Services in Canada (http://www.consular.canada.usembassy.gov/usa_visa.asp#ability:)
"Evidence of qualifications must be original or certified copy. Consular officers in Canada may refuse to issue a visa to H-1B applicants if their education and /or work experience is solely or predominantly from a country other than the U.S. or Canada."
As you probably know, if you are refused a visa in Canada, you cannot return to the US until you travel to your home country and obtain your H-1B visa there.
Lately, US Consular Officers in Canada have been reluctant to issue H-1B visas when the applicant does not have a US or Canadian University Degree AND has never had an H-1B visa issued at his/her home Consulate. The following is an excerpt from Visa Requirements � U.S. Consular Services in Canada (http://www.consular.canada.usembassy.gov/usa_visa.asp#ability:)
"Evidence of qualifications must be original or certified copy. Consular officers in Canada may refuse to issue a visa to H-1B applicants if their education and /or work experience is solely or predominantly from a country other than the U.S. or Canada."
As you probably know, if you are refused a visa in Canada, you cannot return to the US until you travel to your home country and obtain your H-1B visa there.
2010 Rachel Zoe, Bethenny Frankel
insbaby
08-11 04:55 PM
Congratulations!!.
The H4 process should be an easy one and first time, should be no problems. Not sure whether they will do Back ground check on a H4, till end of 2007 all of my friends got it pretty quick, in about 3 to 4 days.
They implemented PIMS after Nov 2007. So your H1 may get slight delay and not sure about new H4 rules.
The H4 process should be an easy one and first time, should be no problems. Not sure whether they will do Back ground check on a H4, till end of 2007 all of my friends got it pretty quick, in about 3 to 4 days.
They implemented PIMS after Nov 2007. So your H1 may get slight delay and not sure about new H4 rules.
more...
nick2deep
02-23 06:39 PM
I have a B.E in Electronics (4 years) and an PGDM in IT (2 years) from India but my I140 is denied on the basis that my PGDM School in India would accept 3 years undergrad and thus the education is not equivalent to M.S in US. I did send the educational evaluation along with I140 but the decision was made on the descretion on CIS.
Please advice if I should refile with education evaluation from anothe agency.
Please advice if I should refile with education evaluation from anothe agency.
hair Pregnant Bethenny Frankel
mk26
02-17 07:39 AM
I received a duplicate order from Hewlett-Packard. Per the customer service person I was instructed to remove the shipping label and write the return number on the box, then call Fed Ex for a pickup, all of which I did. Now, a few weeks later my credit card account has not been credited. I've called the customer service people several times, and received a transmitting tracking number for the return. I've called Fed Ex who say what I have is not adequate to track the item supposedly sitting at their warehouse. I've spoken to the supervisor at HP, and she, like everyone else, keeps referring my problem to the "return specialist", who is supposed to query Fed Ex about this, but nothing happens. Their excuse is that they don't have the actual tracking number to do this. One HP rep I spoke to told me that the return item had not been scanned since the initiation of the return, implying negligence. Yeah somebody dropped the ball. Where do I go next to get some action taken?
Dispute through credit card if possible, just tell them you sent back the item and company did not credit the amount.
Dispute through credit card if possible, just tell them you sent back the item and company did not credit the amount.
more...
akp22
06-16 10:32 PM
Explore interfiling... no personal experience ... but the idea is that they use the same I-485 but interchange the underlying I-140. Seems like there is no special form for this but to just write to USCIS with evidence for the new approved EB1 I-140.
Thanks grupak. Are you EB1 485 filer? How long is it taking to get from 485 filing to green card these days?
Thanks grupak. Are you EB1 485 filer? How long is it taking to get from 485 filing to green card these days?
hot Pregnant Bethenny Frankel
Blog Feeds
10-29 05:40 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
Today's Wall Street Journal has their main front page article on how H-1B quotas have not been used up yet and argues that the market should dictate the numbers rather than Government quotas.
Arbitrary quotas have been ruled unconstitutional by all courts in every domestic affairs except for immigration law. You cannot have quotas for segregation or desegregation, for diversity in public education. You cannot have quotas at workplace. We read in Law School that quotas inherently violate due process. But I had to throw my constitution down my office window when I started practicing immigration law.
When the colonists came to America, there was no problem, no quotas. White Anglo Saxon Protestants could simply come and work. Then as more and more Italians and Chinese came in, restrictions began to be put in from 1875 onwards. Chinese were banned because they were "Coolie labor" for lewd and immoral purposes. After World War 1, the Congress restricted immigration to 2% of their nationality already settled in America. Since there were no non white people in the US at that time, most of Asia and Africa was shut out from the US. This was done to preserve the racial mix in the United States. Since then a lot of restrictive immigration Acts establishing arbitrary quotas were enacted and still valid today. The Permanent Residency Process has quotas in both Employment based and Family Immigration. So does the H-1B program for bringing in the brightest and the best.
These quotas have risen from anti Immigration and Xenophobic attitudes prevalent in America. As the Wall Street Journal points out, why should a very bright person from say India or China come to the US to be treated as a second class citizen, at the bottom of the social ladder? They would rather stay in their own country which are emerging economies. Yet, as the WSJ articles point out, 35% of Microsoft patents were developed by immigrants, and the person who developed Google News was an H-1B from India.
Those patents will just go to India, and someday the children or grandchildren of these anti immigration forces will seek immigration to India.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-3113598453464852981?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2009/10/quotas-in-immigration-law.html)
Today's Wall Street Journal has their main front page article on how H-1B quotas have not been used up yet and argues that the market should dictate the numbers rather than Government quotas.
Arbitrary quotas have been ruled unconstitutional by all courts in every domestic affairs except for immigration law. You cannot have quotas for segregation or desegregation, for diversity in public education. You cannot have quotas at workplace. We read in Law School that quotas inherently violate due process. But I had to throw my constitution down my office window when I started practicing immigration law.
When the colonists came to America, there was no problem, no quotas. White Anglo Saxon Protestants could simply come and work. Then as more and more Italians and Chinese came in, restrictions began to be put in from 1875 onwards. Chinese were banned because they were "Coolie labor" for lewd and immoral purposes. After World War 1, the Congress restricted immigration to 2% of their nationality already settled in America. Since there were no non white people in the US at that time, most of Asia and Africa was shut out from the US. This was done to preserve the racial mix in the United States. Since then a lot of restrictive immigration Acts establishing arbitrary quotas were enacted and still valid today. The Permanent Residency Process has quotas in both Employment based and Family Immigration. So does the H-1B program for bringing in the brightest and the best.
These quotas have risen from anti Immigration and Xenophobic attitudes prevalent in America. As the Wall Street Journal points out, why should a very bright person from say India or China come to the US to be treated as a second class citizen, at the bottom of the social ladder? They would rather stay in their own country which are emerging economies. Yet, as the WSJ articles point out, 35% of Microsoft patents were developed by immigrants, and the person who developed Google News was an H-1B from India.
Those patents will just go to India, and someday the children or grandchildren of these anti immigration forces will seek immigration to India.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-3113598453464852981?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2009/10/quotas-in-immigration-law.html)
more...
house Bethenny Frankel films her
gbof
05-16 01:52 PM
It would be interesting to split the poll as: Apr-May, June-July, Sept-Oct and Nov-Dec 05. I know there r not many between apr 05 and sept 05. but there is a lot in mar05 and sept to dec05 as labors under perm started clearing after sept 05.
tattoo Bethenny Frankel
singhsa3
08-08 12:58 PM
Folks,
It is outrageous that NSC is not churning out any post April 2004 approvals for EB2-I. Is any one is taking any actions?
What can be done?
It is outrageous that NSC is not churning out any post April 2004 approvals for EB2-I. Is any one is taking any actions?
What can be done?
more...
pictures Bethenny Frankel on WWHL
Ectheo
05-09 10:36 PM
I was actually thinking of changing the Mothers Day to a diff font....Lemme get that up...
http://www.ectheo.com/images/stamp-3.jpg
http://www.ectheo.com/images/stamp-3.jpg
dresses Pregnant Bethenny Frankel
gveerab
08-25 06:25 PM
:)
No E2 (EB2) consular processing cases were scheduled by mumbai consulate.
Mumbai consulate - Consular Processing appointments
September
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/eKYmGhGmUU2-9o2l0sVwDg/IV_APPNTS_0908.pdf
August
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/ijH_SNSNIxW4rcRSdtw44Q/IVAPPNTS0808.pdf
Give me a green dot if you can.
No E2 (EB2) consular processing cases were scheduled by mumbai consulate.
Mumbai consulate - Consular Processing appointments
September
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/eKYmGhGmUU2-9o2l0sVwDg/IV_APPNTS_0908.pdf
August
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/ijH_SNSNIxW4rcRSdtw44Q/IVAPPNTS0808.pdf
Give me a green dot if you can.
more...
makeup Bethenny Frankel Twitter: Bryn
solaris27
04-26 02:23 PM
no problem
girlfriend Photos of Bethenny Frankel#39;s
ronhira
09-14 08:23 AM
and who are you? some agent of a tracker website who just wants to create an unrest here by dividing between eb3 and eb3? Or r u a twin brother of tunnel rat? next time, try a with an authentic post, otherwise your effort is wasted....
btw, u have to have a service from vonage if you want to refer someone
Hello all,
Is there any california chapter esp in Nor Cal.
We have to unite EB3 Guys and strike hard!!!
I have heard that next bulletin might bring breaking news for EB3I community but still we cannot keep relying on VBs.
It is like going to Jyotish for knowing future.
EB2 Guys, you should also help us even though if you are getting GCs faster...
Please provide me information on California chapter. I have just joined IV.
I believe it is high time to fight back.
(btw if anybody wants to have vonage $24.99, please let me know. I can refer you)
btw, u have to have a service from vonage if you want to refer someone
Hello all,
Is there any california chapter esp in Nor Cal.
We have to unite EB3 Guys and strike hard!!!
I have heard that next bulletin might bring breaking news for EB3I community but still we cannot keep relying on VBs.
It is like going to Jyotish for knowing future.
EB2 Guys, you should also help us even though if you are getting GCs faster...
Please provide me information on California chapter. I have just joined IV.
I believe it is high time to fight back.
(btw if anybody wants to have vonage $24.99, please let me know. I can refer you)
hairstyles Read more from Bethenny#39;s
Blog Feeds
07-08 11:30 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
andr.in
10-09 09:04 AM
omg everything is s coool
90210
07-19 10:57 AM
Thank you Solaris.
But what I need is the Employer Offer letter to me. They gave me a letter with some 3 lines saying my job title, Salary and start date. It does not include the Job responsibilities. It does not even say the word "Full Time". When I asked them they said that is their standard format.
Do you have format that I can use. I want to send them and insist that I get the letter in that format.
But what I need is the Employer Offer letter to me. They gave me a letter with some 3 lines saying my job title, Salary and start date. It does not include the Job responsibilities. It does not even say the word "Full Time". When I asked them they said that is their standard format.
Do you have format that I can use. I want to send them and insist that I get the letter in that format.
No comments:
Post a Comment